One very big cultural difference
here is the way in which people relate to Authority. This difference isn’t
immediately visible, it takes time to see. But once seen it is very clear,
people here respect authority, of whatever kind, far more than we do in Europe.
In Europe we have seen a gradual
slipping away of trust for authority, be that authority political, religious,
academic, scientific or generational. Perhaps it is the consequence of
experiencing so many people in authority using that authority so badly. Once
burnt twice cautious! Blind respect for authority has given us the Somme, the
Inquisitions, the Gas chambers, the atomic bomb, sectarian conflicts and great
inequalities. Hence we understandably deny our leaders the right to decide for
us what is good and what is bad, we do not listen unquestioningly to
presidents, popes and professors.
Our suspicion of authority goes
further than a distrust in specific people. We are now suspect of the whole
concept of truth. We no longer believe that any person or group can possess truth;
the truth always lies ahead of us yet to be discovered. Science can no longer
speak or truth only the best theory yet discovered, politicians can no longer
claim a grand ideological plan and religious leaders can no longer credibly
proclaim absolute dogmas. We no longer trust anything or anyone easily. This
lack of trust inevitably spills over into our close relationships and
friendships, we form them much less readily than do people in other parts of the world.
By contrast here in the
Philippines (I am of course speaking generally) there is a strong trust in both Authority
and in Truth. People here find it very easy to trust, teachers are valued, the
elderly are venerated and political leaders and given (often undeserved)
respect.
The area where trust in authority
is most visible is the Church. In every parish thousands attend Mass and long
lines of people queue to receive the sacrament of reconciliation. The
traditional rituals and beliefs of the Church are trusted and respected. People
here do not see truth as something beyond our horizon waiting to be discovered
in the future, rather truth is something present here and now, very much
possessed by the Catholic Church.
Bishops and priests are given
enormous respect, authority and trust; they are treated as spiritually superior
to the laity. The model of priesthood lived out here is a very paternalistic
one, the priest is not so much seen as a fellow struggler but as a spiritual
father whose role is to lead the simple faithful.
In the Europe this paternalistic
model of Church, where it still exists, is an outdated anachronism. A people to
whom trust does not come easily cannot relate to this form of spiritual
leadership, we balk at its suffocating certainty. Perhaps much of the non-participation of European Christians in their local parishes is due to leaders failing to adapt to these changing realities. In Europe spiritual
leadership has to be more humble, our priests must be equals not masters,
fellow strugglers also searching for a way to follow God. To claim any kind of
higher or privileged status is to risk becoming irrelevant and appearing
arrogant. A culture which finds trust difficult yearns for leaders who also
struggle.
Perhaps our European approach to
truth is the central difference between us and the rest of the world, not just
the Philippines. Maybe it is this philosophical difference which is fuelling
much of the discord which rumbles on visibly in the Anglican Communion and less
visibly in the Catholic Church. We Europeans cannot sit comfortably in a Church
filled with certainty and absolutes, the very absolutes in which so many
non-Europeans believe so dearly.